Compare

How development feasibility software stacks up.

Spreadsheets, legacy desktop software, and modern SaaS — what each is good for, and where Feaso fits.

Start free trial Book a demo
The alternatives

Spreadsheet + legacy + generic SaaS

  • Spreadsheets: flexible, brittle, slow to onboard
  • Legacy desktop: deep, expensive, slow
  • US-led SaaS: modern UI, but built for US tax / cost stack
  • Templates: a starting point that breaks on every change
Feaso

Feaso

  • Built for Australian residential development
  • Web-native, fast to onboard
  • Australian cost stack and finance norms baked in
  • Transparent pricing, free trial

The four real options

Most Australian residential developers choose between a spreadsheet (the default), an inherited Excel template, a legacy desktop tool (EstateMaster, Feastudy, ARGUS Developer), and — recently — a handful of modern SaaS feasibility tools.

Feaso's place in the market

Modern, like the SaaS tools. Australian, like the legacy ones. Sized for residential apartment and townhouse development. The fastest way for a small to mid-sized residential developer to leave the spreadsheet behind without taking on a heavy enterprise tool.

Related

Excel vs Feaso
EstateMaster alternative
Spreadsheet vs software

Questions

Frequently asked

How do I decide which tool to use?

Match the tool to the recurring workflow. If you run more than 2–3 feasibilities a month, a structured tool pays back inside a month. If you run one a quarter, Excel is probably enough.

Run your first feasibility in 90 seconds.

No spreadsheets. No setup. Fourteen-day free trial, no credit card.

Start free trial Book a demo