Example

A 28-apartment scheme, end to end.

From site acquisition to settlement — the full feasibility for an apartment scheme in Sydney's inner south, with every assumption stated.

Site

1,200 m² site, 42 Botany Rd, Waterloo NSW

Typology

6-level boutique apartments over basement parking

Units

28 apartments — 12×1-bed, 12×2-bed, 4×3-bed

Program

30 months — 6 month design, 18 month build, 6 month settlement

Numbers

The output set, in full.

Gross realisation value
$28.6M
Net realisation
$26.2M
Total development cost
$24.1M
Profit
$2.1M
Profit on cost
8.7%
Development margin
8.0%
Equity IRR
14.5%
Peak debt
$16.4M
Peak equity
$5.2M

Site and scheme

1,200 m² lot in Waterloo, R3 zoning, FSR 2.4. Allowable GFA ~2,880 m². Scheme: 6 residential levels over a single basement, 28 apartments, 22 car spaces.

Revenue

Pricing based on March 2026 comparable sales for the Waterloo / Alexandria submarket: 1-bed $720k, 2-bed $1.05M, 3-bed $1.48M, car space $65k. GRV $28.59M, net realisation $26.2M after 2.0% selling costs and GST.

Costs

  • Land: $7.2M (acquisition only — stamp duty separate)
  • Construction: $12.18M ($4,200/m² × 2,900 m² GFA)
  • Professional fees: $0.97M (8% of construction)
  • Statutory contributions and authority fees: $1.15M
  • Finance costs: $1.42M
  • Marketing and selling: $0.58M
  • Contingency: $0.61M (5% of construction)

TDC $24.11M.

Finance structure

$5M developer equity, $17M senior construction facility (LTC 70.5%, LTV 59.5%) at 8.5% all-in. Equity drawn first, debt drawn against monthly progress claims, settled down on dwelling settlements.

Result

Profit on cost 8.7%, well below the 18–22% hurdle expected for a build-to-sell apartment project of this scale. The scheme either needs sharper pricing, lower build cost, or a different scheme size before it goes to IC.

What changes if pricing lifts 8%?

A second scenario at 8% higher pricing (2-bed at $1.13M instead of $1.05M) lifts net realisation to $28.3M. Profit on cost climbs to 17.4% — almost at the hurdle. A third scenario combining the higher pricing with a 5% reduction in construction rate (e.g. simpler facade) clears 22%.

Questions

Frequently asked

Are these numbers from a real project?

The structure is real; the numbers are illustrative and rounded for clarity. Use them as a benchmark, not a quote.

How would Feaso handle this scheme in practice?

All three scenarios — base, higher pricing, simpler facade — would live in the same project. You'd switch between them in a click and read each one's full output set.

Run your first feasibility in 90 seconds.

No spreadsheets. No setup. Fourteen-day free trial, no credit card.